<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Type revival &#8211; Nisaba Publishing and Typography</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nisaba.feuerherm.ca/category/type/type-revival/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nisaba.feuerherm.ca</link>
	<description>For all your editorial needs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 22:07:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Beginnings in type revival</title>
		<link>https://nisaba.feuerherm.ca/2023/05/04/beginnings-in-type-revival/</link>
					<comments>https://nisaba.feuerherm.ca/2023/05/04/beginnings-in-type-revival/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ludwig Sindila]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 22:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Type revival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typefaces]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nisaba.feuerherm.ca/?p=238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Over the course of research on Renaissance fonts, I ran across some interesting material put out by the Dutch Type Library, including a book on reviving a Rosart typeface (see The Rosart Project) as well as another (see Reviving Type) outlining two revivals, one a Garamont typeface, the other a]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Over the course of research on Renaissance fonts, I ran across some <a href="https://www.dutchtypelibrary.nl/Shops/BookShop/contents/en-us/d1.html">interesting material</a> put out by the <a href="https://www.dutchtypelibrary.nl">Dutch Type Library</a>, including a book on reviving a Rosart typeface (see <em><a href="https://www.rosart.nl/">The Rosart Project</a></em>) as well as another (see <em><a href="https://www.revivingtype.com/">Reviving Type</a></em>) outlining two revivals, one a Garamont typeface, the other a typeface by Miklós Kis.</p>



<p>These in turn led me to the <a href="http://www.lettermodel.org">blog</a> of Dr Frank Blokland where I discovered that I could <a href="https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/43556">download his thesis</a> on Renaissance type standardization.</p>



<p>I read the thesis through once, finding it very enlightening, then turned to the other two books. I&#8217;ve just finished going through the thesis a second time, this time taking careful notes regarding salient points, and am now going through the other two for the second time with the same intent.</p>



<p>I learned that the earliest metal type was produced in 1470 by Nicolas Jenson, a French punchcutter who may have learned to set type from <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Gutenberg">Johannes Gutenberg</a>. Adobe has produced <a href="https://fonts.adobe.com/fonts/adobe-jenson">a fairly faithful revival</a> of the typeface with an extensive repertoire of fonts, but it doesn&#8217;t really please me all that much.((It&#8217;s just a little too similar to handwritten manuscript in some respects (consider the lowercase &#8216;e&#8217;, for example) and the proportions of capitals are not as elegant as they might be.)) I much prefer <a href="https://catalog.monotype.com/?keyword=bembo">Monotype Bembo Book</a> (an improvement over their earlier Bembo, which can be viewed through the same link), a revival of the 1495 typeface of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francesco_Griffo">Francesco da Bologna</a> (a.k.a. Griffo) as used in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pietro_Bembo">Pietro Bembo</a>&#8216;s <em>De Aetna</em> (<a href="https://archive.org/details/ita-bnc-ald-00000039-001">available here</a>), but it is deficient with regards to those Renaissance characters which have fallen into disuse, such as long S.</p>



<p>I am therefore considering my own typeface project, either</p>



<ul>
<li> a revival of Griffo&#8217;s <em>Hypnerotomachia Poliphili</em> (<a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjmpcDbz9z-AhW7j4kEHbVrB0wQFnoECBMQAQ&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bauerverlag.eu%2Fdownloads%2Fhypnerotomachiap00colo.pdf&amp;usg=AOvVaw03iXJdXwkgFQGh6nUuzK8E">facsimile downloadable here</a>) 1499 typeface, or</li>



<li>an &#8216;inspired by&#8217; creation of my own. There are a few commercial revivals of this typeface (search &#8216;Poliphil&#8217; on <a href="http://myfonts.com">MyFonts.com</a>) but the most faithful (by Adobe) is, again, deficient, and I think I would learn a lot making the attempt myself. If I don&#8217;t go through with it, I could always consider <a href="https://www.myfonts.com/collections/poliphili-font-flanker">Flanker&#8217;s<em> </em>Poliphili</a>, which comes close and is to be had at a reasonable price. The advantage of doing one&#8217;s own revival, of cours, is that there are no licensing strings attached!</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nisaba.feuerherm.ca/2023/05/04/beginnings-in-type-revival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: nisaba.feuerherm.ca @ 2024-08-28 16:58:06 by W3 Total Cache
-->